Apply the Theoretical Approach to the Case Study Essays

Apply the Theoretical Approach to the Case Study Essays Apply the Theoretical Approach to the Case Study Essay Apply the Theoretical Approach to the Case Study Essay Use the Theoretical Approach to the Case Study Transference can be a powerful curative tool or a unsafe and counterproductive obstruction to fostering therapy. It is a procedure that triggers one’s memory to believe of a individual or clip period related to a individual in his/her life ( Woodhouse et. al. , 2003 ) . This trigger may take to projection, which can be defined as projecting the interaction between a known individual in one’s life onto another individual who is similar in facial look, voice or idiosyncrasies. In therapy, clients sometimes begin to associate to their healers as they did with person else in their lives ( Conner, 2001 ) . Counter-transference occurs when a healer treats the client as person that is or was familiar in the therapist’s personal life. Undetected, counter-transference can potentially be extremely damaging to the client’s wellbeing. Sometimes, healers may even respond to a client’s transference issues by reacting in counter-transference ( Shahar, 2004 ) . Many cases of transference and counter-transference are detected in the instance of Dr. Notcut and his clients, Arnold and Betty Celtic. It is interesting to first reference the sarcasm of Dr. Notcut’s reluctance to supply curative services to the Celtics, although he was non precisely certain why this was so. It appears, nevertheless, that Dr. Notcut felt that Mr. Celtic’s petition for therapy was slightly superficial and indefensible. However, it could besides be possible that it was due to Dr. Notcut’s subconscious sensing of possible counter-transference. This irony highlights the fact that the phenomena of transference and counter-transference can non be easy detected or predicted. It is a procedure that alternatively unravels in the procedure of therapy over clip. Although descriptions of Dr. Notcut’s relationship with her gramps was non discussed for some clip within the instance description, Dr. Notcut began doing elusive mentions to his gramps early on in his relationship with the Celtics. Dr. Notcut described the Celtics manner of dressing in what his gramps would name a â€Å"flat hat† and â€Å"bonnet† . Dr. Notcut identified a peculiar clip period of the clients’ lives to be comparative to his grandfather’s. This connexion to his gramps may hold been a elusive and benign one, peculiarly if it were an stray incident. However, it is observed that other possible issues of counter-transference occurred between Dr. Notcut and Mr. Celtic as therapy progressed. After seeing Arnold for some clip, Dr. Notcut had a dream. In the dream, Dr. Notcut experienced feelings of irritation and choler when Arnold was persistently laughed upon by others for acting a certain manner. The laughter was based on a gag initiated by Dr. Notcut. The events of the dream parallel really closely with Dr. Notcut’s described feelings of great fondness for but embarrassment toward his gramps. It is possible that counter-transference was happening as Dr. Notcut began to sympathize with and derive an apprehension of Arnold as he at the same time besides felt this empathy for his gramps. Therefore, he showed choler and perchance repent for roasting Arnold in his dream. Another country for possible counter-transference between Dr. Notcut and Arnold relates to similar parent-child relationships, in the sense that a relationship was basically non-existent between both work forces and their parents. Arnold’s parents, although present physically, were unavailable to him. As he stated, his male parent was an alcoholic, his female parent badly depressed. Dr. Notcut’s parents were besides physically present, based on his study that he visited them on a regular basis. However, as he stated, the relationship was superficial due to their dedication to their callings and deficiency of desire to raise a kid. Dr. Notcut mentioned during depth psychology that Arnold had â€Å"a deep-rooted fond regard to his father† . He added that Arnold’s ambivalency toward his male parent represented Arnold’s desire to both keep a valuable relationship with her male parent, but besides distance himself wholly. It is of import that Dr. Notcut expression within himself to detect his ain feelings toward his male parent ; and to besides screen out whether his reading is an integrating of his ain feelings and those of Arnold’s. Transference was besides detected between the Celtics. Betty mentioned that she was powerless since childhood due to her gender. Her household did non see her every bit to her male siblings, peculiarly her male parent. Therefore, Betty decided to recover control over her life as an grownup. This end to recover control was born out of her relationship with her household of beginning but was so applied to her matrimony. This determination surely led Betty to authorise herself and go a more self-asserting grownup. However, due to the transference that occurred, issues environing control in her matrimony appeared to be more hard to draw apart from household issues of control. It is besides interesting that Betty was one time the sensed â€Å"weak† individual in a relationship, and now taken complete control over state of affairss, even ruling them. Further, she even came to contemn failing and had great trouble associating to Arnold when he appeared to be weak. In her interactions with Arnold, it appears that she despises failing because it causes her to see her younger and â€Å"weaker† ego in Arnold’s minutes of failing. This transference is a contemplation of herself, but in a different clip in her life. Due to the complex nature of this signifier of transference, it can easy travel undetected and perpetuate a rhythm ; in this instance, a rhythm of control. Transference and counter-transference can be valuable tools in easing therapy and in the therapist self-reflecting sing his or her ain issues. However, these signifiers of processing may besides be damaging to the curative procedure. It is pertinent that clinicians continually self-reflect upon their ain purposes and connexions with a client’s personal narrative. Merely so can clients be served to the fullest potency. Mentions Conner, M.G. ( 2001 ) . Transference: Are you a biological clip machine? The Source. Shahar, Golan. ( 2004 ) . Transference–Countertransference: Where the ( political ) action is. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 14 ( 4 ) , 371-396. Woodhouse, S. , Schlosser, L.Z. , Crook, R. , .Ligiero, D. , A ; Gelso, C. J. ( 2003 ) . Client fond regard to therapist: Relations to transference and client remembrances of parental caregiving. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50 ( 4 ) , 395-408.